Much the Doc On Sports blog over the past few months have been at the very least peripherally about life in the pandemic. In fact, nine blogs have been tagged with pandemic and with five with COVID-19 since February 17. This unwelcome and unsettling version of the new normal is seemingly being thrust upon us whether we’re ready for it or not.
There are loads of us who are simply in disagreement about what a new standard of life in the time of COVID should be, and the world of sports is no different. How does our relationship with sports change in this new reality? What does it means for sports as a diversion from normal life, when it is swallowed by the pressures and realities of of the pandemic. Is is the same distraction it was or is it something else entirely?
That new reality has already come to K-League soccer as the league has returned to regular action. The first game of the new season, postponed from a February start date, saw Jeonbuk Motors defeat the Suwon Bluewings 1-0 in Jeonju, about an hour’s train ride southwest of Seoul.
The K-League is widely recognized as the top football league in Asia, so its return to action is a pretty big deal. The first game was streamed on YouTube and no fans were in attendance. The league feels comfortable returning to play since all 22 teams were tested for COVID-19 with zero positive results. Every player, coach, and official was had their temperature checked before stepping on the pitch, and the K-League is taking a very proactive approach to continuing play.
For example, there was no pre-match handshake, which of course makes perfect sense. Coaches and players who weren’t on the pitch playing were required to wear face masks. They were even advised against blowing their noses (!) during the game.
With no fans in attendance, recordings of chanting fans and cheering crowds were broadcast over the PA system. (What would Tom Brady think?) There were no hecklers, no high fives, and no raise-the-roofs. I can’t imagine how weird and deafening that silence would be, with no crowd to motivate, positively or negatively, would the game feel like a real game or would it just feel like a scrimmage? Sure, the fact that a score is kept, and the league sanctions it as such is important, but I wonder subconsciously if the player effort is the same. Would you try as hard, or be as competitive, without a rabid fanbase cheering your every move, even simulated ones?
But what I found more interesting, and what I think is ultimately more prescient for the restart of American sports leagues, (if we get to that) was the rules against spitting and talking. Players were told not to talk and all conversations between players and officials were highly restricted. I can understand how you’d want to limit players unnecessarily haggling with referees, we know how heated these exchanges can be in football as players argue calls vociferously. Why else was the card system instituted, am I right?
Certainly this would be a novel and rather interesting way to dampen these kinds of interactions, and perhaps lower the temperature. So much so that I wonder how this would work on the court or on the ice. Could this finally be the way to shut Chris Paul up?
We can only hope.